API testing has become a critical part of modern software development. Developers need reliable tools to test, debug, and document their APIs effectively. Two names consistently pop up in this conversation: Postman and Insomnia. Both tools have passionate user bases, but they take different approaches to solving the same problem.
This guide breaks down everything you need to know about these two popular API testing platforms. You'll learn about their features, pricing, performance, and which one fits your specific needs.
Before diving into the comparison, let's talk about why developers rely on dedicated API testing tools. You could technically test APIs using command-line tools like cURL or write custom scripts. Many developers did exactly that for years.
The problem? That approach doesn't scale well. When you're working with dozens or hundreds of API endpoints, managing request collections, handling authentication, and collaborating with team members becomes a nightmare.
Modern API testing tools solve these problems. They provide intuitive interfaces for sending requests, organizing endpoints, managing environments, and sharing work with colleagues. They turn a tedious technical task into a streamlined workflow.
Postman greets new users with a comprehensive workspace. The interface feels feature-rich from the moment you open it. You'll see options for creating collections, environments, mock servers, and monitors right away.
The platform offers both a web version and native desktop applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux. This flexibility means you can work from anywhere with internet access or stick to your local machine.
New users get access to the free tier immediately. No credit card required. You can start testing APIs within minutes of signing up. The learning curve exists, but Postman provides extensive documentation and interactive tutorials to help you climb it.
Insomnia takes a different approach. The interface feels clean and uncluttered. When you first launch the application, you're presented with a simple, focused workspace that doesn't overwhelm you with options.
The tool emphasizes getting straight to work. You can create your first request in seconds. The learning curve feels gentler because fewer features compete for your attention initially.
Insomnia also offers desktop applications across major operating systems. The design philosophy leans toward simplicity and speed. Users who value a distraction-free environment often appreciate this approach.
Both tools excel at the fundamental task of building and sending HTTP requests. You can easily set up GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, and other HTTP methods. Headers, parameters, and body content are all straightforward to configure.
Postman organizes requests into collections. These collections can contain folders and subfolders, creating a hierarchical structure. This organization system works well for large projects with hundreds of endpoints. You can share entire collections with teammates, making collaboration smoother.
Insomnia uses a similar collection-based system but keeps the interface cleaner. The tool groups related requests together and displays them in a sidebar. You can quickly jump between requests without navigating through multiple layers of folders.
Authentication often trips up developers. Both tools recognize this and provide built-in support for common authentication methods.
Postman supports OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, API keys, basic auth, bearer tokens, digest auth, and AWS Signature. The platform walks you through the authentication flow for complex protocols like OAuth. You can save authentication credentials at the collection level, so every request in that collection automatically uses the same auth method.
Insomnia covers the same authentication methods with a slightly different implementation. The tool makes it easy to switch between authentication types while testing. You can also store sensitive credentials in environment variables to keep them secure.
Real-world API testing requires working with different environments. You might have development, staging, and production servers, each with different URLs and credentials.
Postman's environment system lets you create multiple environments and switch between them with a dropdown menu. Each environment stores its own set of variables. You reference these variables in your requests using double curly braces: {{variable_name}}.
The platform supports both environment variables (specific to one environment) and global variables (available across all environments). Collection variables sit between these two levels, available to all requests in a collection but not across collections.
Insomnia handles environments similarly but with a cleaner interface. The tool uses a concept called "sub-environments" that inherit from base environments. This inheritance model can simplify configuration management for complex projects.
Both tools let you use environment variables in request URLs, headers, body content, and authentication credentials. This flexibility makes it easy to reuse the same request structure across different environments.
Postman shines when it comes to scripting capabilities. You can write JavaScript code that runs before sending a request (pre-request scripts) or after receiving a response (test scripts).
These scripts open up powerful possibilities. You can:
The platform includes the Chai assertion library, making it easy to write readable test assertions. You can run these tests manually or automate them through Postman's collection runner.
Insomnia offers similar functionality through its plugin system. You can write custom plugins in JavaScript to extend the tool's capabilities. The scripting feels less integrated compared to Postman, but it's still powerful for users who need it.
Postman's collection runner lets you execute an entire collection of requests in sequence. This feature is invaluable for integration testing and workflow validation.
You can configure the runner to use different environments, import test data from CSV or JSON files, and set the number of iterations. The runner displays test results in real-time, showing which requests passed or failed.
Insomnia doesn't include a built-in collection runner in the same way. Users who need this functionality typically export their collections and run them using Newman (Postman's command-line companion) or write custom scripts.
Both tools support GraphQL, but they approach it differently.
Postman treats GraphQL as a request type alongside REST. You can write queries and mutations in the request body, use autocomplete based on the schema, and view the response. The experience feels similar to testing REST APIs.
Insomnia was actually one of the first API clients to offer first-class GraphQL support. The tool provides a dedicated GraphQL interface with schema exploration, query autocomplete, and variable management. Many developers prefer Insomnia's GraphQL implementation because it feels more native and polished.
Modern applications often use protocols beyond REST and GraphQL.
Postman has added support for WebSocket and gRPC testing. You can establish WebSocket connections, send messages, and monitor real-time communication. The gRPC support lets you import proto files and test gRPC services directly.
Insomnia also supports gRPC through plugins. The implementation isn't as polished as Postman's native support, but it gets the job done for most use cases.
API testing rarely happens in isolation. Teams need to share collections, synchronize changes, and collaborate on API development.
Postman excels in this area. The platform offers cloud synchronization built into the free tier. You can share collections with specific team members or generate public links. Teams can work on the same collection simultaneously, and Postman handles conflict resolution when multiple people edit the same request.
The platform also integrates with Git. You can connect your Postman collections to GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories. This integration enables proper version control and fits naturally into existing development workflows.
Insomnia takes a different approach. The free version doesn't include cloud sync. You need to export and import collections manually or use Git to share them. Kong (Insomnia's parent company) offers paid plans that include cloud sync and team collaboration features.
Many developers actually prefer Insomnia's approach. Storing collections as files in your Git repository keeps everything together with your code. You don't depend on a third-party cloud service, and you have full control over your data.
API documentation is crucial but often neglected. Both tools help generate documentation from your collections.
Postman can automatically generate documentation from your collections. The platform creates a clean, browsable website showing all your endpoints, request examples, and response samples. You can publish this documentation publicly or keep it private for your team.
The documentation stays synchronized with your collections. When you update a request in Postman, the documentation updates automatically. This sync eliminates the common problem of outdated documentation.
Insomnia offers documentation generation through plugins and export options. The process requires more manual work compared to Postman's automated approach. You can export your collections in various formats and use external tools to generate documentation.
Insomnia was built with performance in mind. The application typically uses less memory than Postman and feels snappier, especially on older hardware or when working with large collections.
Postman has improved its performance over the years, but it still tends to use more system resources. The Electron-based application can feel sluggish on machines with limited RAM. Users working with hundreds of requests sometimes notice lag when searching or filtering collections.
That said, Postman's performance is acceptable for most users. The difference becomes noticeable primarily when pushing the tools to their limits with massive collections or complex workflows.
Both tools work offline since they're desktop applications. You can build and test requests without an internet connection.
Postman stores your collections and environments locally. You can access everything offline, though cloud-synced content requires an initial sync when online. The desktop app caches your data effectively.
Insomnia works fully offline by default. Since the free version doesn't use cloud sync, you never depend on external servers. All your data stays on your machine.
Postman offers a generous free tier that includes:
The free tier covers most individual developers and small teams. You can build and test APIs without paying anything.
Paid plans start at $12 per user per month (Basic plan). The Professional plan costs $29 per user per month and adds:
Enterprise plans offer custom pricing for large organizations needing advanced security, compliance, and support.
Insomnia's free version includes all core API testing features. You can use it indefinitely without restrictions on the number of requests or collections.
The paid plans (Insomnia Pro and Enterprise) start at $5 per user per month. These plans add:
Kong positions Insomnia as part of its larger API management platform. Teams using Kong Gateway or other Kong products often adopt Insomnia as their testing tool.
Postman's interface embraces feature density. The application tries to put many tools at your fingertips. Tabs, panels, and menus compete for screen real estate. This density can feel overwhelming at first but becomes powerful once you learn where everything lives.
The platform uses a multi-tab interface. You can open several requests simultaneously and switch between them like browser tabs. This approach works well when comparing responses or working on multiple endpoints at once.
Insomnia prioritizes simplicity and focus. The interface feels more like a native application than a web app. Animations are subtle, and the color scheme is easy on the eyes (with excellent dark mode support).
The tool displays one request at a time in the main panel. Some users find this limitation frustrating when they want to reference multiple requests simultaneously. Others appreciate the focus it creates.
Both applications support light and dark themes. Postman's themes affect the entire interface, though customization options are limited.
Insomnia goes further with theming. The community has created numerous themes, and you can install them through the plugin system. You can customize colors, fonts, and layout details to match your preferences.
Postman offers a marketplace of integrations rather than a plugin system. You can connect Postman to services like Slack, GitHub, Datadog, and Splunk. These integrations trigger actions based on events in Postman or pull data from external systems.
The platform also supports custom webhook integrations. You can send collection run results to any webhook endpoint, enabling custom automation workflows.
Insomnia's plugin system is more flexible. Developers can create plugins that modify almost any aspect of the application. Plugins can add new themes, authentication methods, response visualizations, and entirely new features.
The community has built hundreds of plugins. You can browse and install them directly from within Insomnia. This extensibility appeals to developers who want to customize their tools heavily.
Newman is Postman's command-line collection runner. It lets you execute Postman collections from the terminal or integrate them into continuous integration pipelines.
You install Newman through npm:
npm install -g newman
Then run collections with a simple command:
newman run collection.json -e environment.json
Newman supports HTML reporters, JUnit XML output, and custom reporters. It integrates smoothly with Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and other CI/CD platforms.
Teams use Newman to run API tests automatically on every code push. This automation catches breaking changes before they reach production.
Insomnia doesn't have an official CLI tool as mature as Newman. The community has developed third-party CLI runners, but they're not as polished or widely adopted.
Many Insomnia users export their collections to Postman format and use Newman for CLI execution. This workflow is clunky but functional.
Kong has hinted at improving CLI support in future releases, recognizing it as an important feature for modern development workflows.
Postman lets you create mock servers from your collections. These servers simulate API responses, allowing frontend developers to work before the backend is ready.
You define example responses for each endpoint. Postman's mock server returns these examples when it receives matching requests. You can even script dynamic responses based on request parameters.
Mock servers run in Postman's cloud, so they're accessible from anywhere. The free tier includes 1,000 calls per month, which suffices for development purposes.
Insomnia doesn't include built-in mock servers. Users who need mocking typically use external tools or plugins.
Some teams prefer this separation. They use dedicated mocking tools like Mockoon or WireMock alongside Insomnia for testing. This approach provides more control over mock behavior but requires managing additional tools.
Postman stores collection data in the cloud by default. The platform uses encryption in transit and at rest. Kong (Postman's parent company) has achieved SOC 2 Type II compliance, indicating solid security practices.
Some organizations hesitate to store API credentials and sensitive data in a third-party cloud. Postman addresses this through its on-premises offering, which runs entirely within your infrastructure.
The platform also lets you avoid sending sensitive data to its servers. You can store credentials in environment variables that never sync to the cloud (marked as "secret" values).
Insomnia's free version doesn't upload data to any cloud service. Everything stays local. This approach appeals to security-conscious developers and organizations with strict data policies.
When you upgrade to paid plans with cloud sync, Insomnia uses end-to-end encryption. Even Kong can't decrypt your data. Only you and your team members with the encryption key can access it.
This privacy-first approach has earned Insomnia loyalty among developers working on sensitive projects or in regulated industries.
Postman maintains extensive documentation covering every feature in detail. The platform offers video tutorials, webinars, and a learning center with courses on API development.
The community forum is active, with Postman employees frequently answering questions. The platform's popularity means you can find solutions to most problems through a quick web search.
Paid plans include email support with guaranteed response times. Enterprise customers get dedicated support representatives.
Insomnia's documentation is solid but less comprehensive than Postman's. The tool's simpler feature set means there's less to document.
The community communicates primarily through GitHub issues and Discord. Responses can be slower compared to Postman's official support channels.
Kong's acquisition of Insomnia has brought more resources to the project. The documentation and support are improving, though they still lag behind Postman's mature ecosystem.
Postman fits well for:
The platform scales from solo developers to enterprise teams seamlessly. Its feature richness justifies the learning curve for professional API development.
Insomnia works best for:
The tool's performance advantages become significant when working with large collections or on older hardware.
Postman requires:
Insomnia requires:
Both tools support Windows 10+, macOS 10.13+, and major Linux distributions.
Postman uses JSON for collections and environments. You can export collections in various formats including OpenAPI (Swagger), RAML, and GraphQL schemas.
Insomnia also uses JSON for its native format. The tool can import Postman collections, making migration relatively painless. Export options include OpenAPI and HAR (HTTP Archive) formats.
Both tools support importing cURL commands, Swagger/OpenAPI specs, and WADL files. This import flexibility helps when adopting the tools for existing projects.
The transition is straightforward. Insomnia can import Postman collection JSON files directly. You'll lose some Postman-specific features like collection variables and pre-request scripts, but basic requests transfer cleanly.
You'll need to recreate environments manually or convert them to Insomnia's format. Test scripts won't carry over since Insomnia uses a different scripting approach.
Teams making this switch typically do so for Insomnia's performance or privacy benefits. The migration takes a few hours for small projects and several days for large collections with extensive automation.
This migration requires more work. Insomnia can export collections in Postman v2 format, but the export isn't perfect.
GraphQL requests may need manual adjustment. Environment variables require recreation. Any custom plugins or scripts need reimplementation using Postman's tools.
The benefit? You gain access to Postman's extensive ecosystem, collaboration features, and automation capabilities. Teams typically make this move when scaling up and needing advanced features.
Postman has expanded beyond API testing into API lifecycle management. The company positions itself as a complete platform for designing, testing, documenting, and monitoring APIs.
Recent updates focus on API governance, security scanning, and team workspace improvements. The roadmap emphasizes features for large enterprises and complex API ecosystems.
Kong acquired Insomnia to strengthen its API management portfolio. The tool now integrates more closely with Kong Gateway and other Kong products.
Recent updates have improved cloud sync reliability and team features. The roadmap hints at better CI/CD integration and enhanced plugin capabilities.
Kong seems committed to keeping Insomnia lightweight while gradually adding enterprise features for paid tiers.
The "better" tool depends entirely on your needs and context.
Choose Postman if you need:
Choose Insomnia if you value:
Many developers use both. They might prefer Insomnia for daily API exploration and testing while using Postman's collection runner and Newman for automated testing in CI/CD pipelines.
The free tiers of both tools are generous enough that you can try them risk-free. Spend a week with each tool on a real project. The right choice will become clear based on your workflow and preferences.
Start with the scratch pad workspace to explore without syncing. Create a simple collection with a few requests to a public API. Add environment variables for the base URL. Write a basic test script checking response status codes.
Use the learning center tutorials. They walk you through common workflows step by step. Join the community forum when you get stuck. Thousands of developers have likely faced the same issues.
Install the app and create your first request to a simple API like JSONPlaceholder. Experiment with the environment system early. Set up base environments with common variables.
Explore the plugin directory. Install a few themes and tools that match your workflow. Since Insomnia is lightweight, don't hesitate to experiment freely.
Check out GraphQL APIs to see where Insomnia really shines. The interface makes GraphQL exploration intuitive and pleasant.
Both Postman and Insomnia are excellent API testing tools. Postman offers a comprehensive platform with every feature you might need. Insomnia provides a fast, focused experience that respects your privacy and system resources.
Your choice comes down to priorities. Do you want an all-in-one platform with extensive collaboration features? Go with Postman. Do you prefer a lightweight tool that does API testing exceptionally well without bloat? Choose Insomnia.
The good news? You can't really make a wrong choice here. Both tools will serve you well for API development and testing. Try them both, see which feels better, and start building great APIs.
Happy testing!
You're staring at your screen, ready to start your next UI design project. Two tools sit in your bookmarks: Figma and Adobe XD. Both promise to make your design workflow smoother, but which one deser
Read More
Design teams face a critical decision when picking their primary interface design platform. Two names dominate the conversation: Figma and Sketch. Both tools have shaped how designers create digital
Read More
You're staring at your screen, stuck on a coding problem for the third hour straight. Your deadline is tomorrow. You need help fast. But which AI coding assistant should you turn to - GitHub Copilo
Read More